<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do Not Use These Medical Abbreviations!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/2007/11/do-not-use-these-medical-abbreviations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/2007/11/do-not-use-these-medical-abbreviations/</link>
	<description>A blog from inside the emergency department</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:45:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ava</title>
		<link>http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/2007/11/do-not-use-these-medical-abbreviations/#comment-84218</link>
		<dc:creator>Ava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whitecoatrants.wordpress.com/2007/11/04/do-not-use-these-medical-abbreviations/#comment-84218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow....I sincerely hope you NEVER treat anyone in my family - or anyone I know.  If you are not concerned about clarity in the medical record (a legal document that can be your own personal professional downfall in court), then I worry about your patients.  Physicians and all other treating professionals have to stop using the volume of reports required for patient care as  an excuse for laziness.  Write it out or dictate it in full or you will personally lose.  It&#039;s about LIFE people....not about your failings as a professional individual. 

Do not dictate in a car with the top down.  Do not dictate on a cell phone.  Do not dictate in a hot tub, bath tub, or shower.  Do not dictate in the OR.  Do not dictate next to machines in the ICU.  Do not dictate at any sporting event.  It would seem that a HIPAA violation discussion should also take place. 

If you are responsible for documenting your own transcription, WRITE IT OUT COMPLETELY.  Do not use texting language.  Remember, other non-medical professionals (including lawyers and patients who will sue you) are reading your report.   

You are all professionals.  Behave like it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230;.I sincerely hope you NEVER treat anyone in my family &#8211; or anyone I know.  If you are not concerned about clarity in the medical record (a legal document that can be your own personal professional downfall in court), then I worry about your patients.  Physicians and all other treating professionals have to stop using the volume of reports required for patient care as  an excuse for laziness.  Write it out or dictate it in full or you will personally lose.  It&#8217;s about LIFE people&#8230;.not about your failings as a professional individual. </p>
<p>Do not dictate in a car with the top down.  Do not dictate on a cell phone.  Do not dictate in a hot tub, bath tub, or shower.  Do not dictate in the OR.  Do not dictate next to machines in the ICU.  Do not dictate at any sporting event.  It would seem that a HIPAA violation discussion should also take place. </p>
<p>If you are responsible for documenting your own transcription, WRITE IT OUT COMPLETELY.  Do not use texting language.  Remember, other non-medical professionals (including lawyers and patients who will sue you) are reading your report.   </p>
<p>You are all professionals.  Behave like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patty</title>
		<link>http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/2007/11/do-not-use-these-medical-abbreviations/#comment-81467</link>
		<dc:creator>patty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whitecoatrants.wordpress.com/2007/11/04/do-not-use-these-medical-abbreviations/#comment-81467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Flash forward to 2012. Doctors/providers now using speech recognition to save them money.  We medical transcriptionists take a cut in pay of about half because we have about half the work to do? We don&#039;t have to deal with scribbled handwriting, we get to deal with garbled speech and catch all the mistakes that are made (i.e. someone without renal failure who has a creatinine of 10.9; another case of someone with an elevated creatinine, normal LFTs, on hemodialysis but final diagnosis is &quot;chronic liver disease) and these are only a couple of examples. The point is that we save your asses a lot of time and you don&#039;t even know it. I made under 10,000 dollars last year and a lot of very good MTs are getting out of the business because it&#039;s not worth it. The risk is too high, we are concerned and very careful with documentation on people who are NOT our patients and the pay is getting lower all the time. Excuse me if I fail to sympathize with your &quot;dangerous abbreviation&quot; complaint. We MTs are responsible for making sure they are expanded properly and that is the last thing we have to complain about.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flash forward to 2012. Doctors/providers now using speech recognition to save them money.  We medical transcriptionists take a cut in pay of about half because we have about half the work to do? We don&#8217;t have to deal with scribbled handwriting, we get to deal with garbled speech and catch all the mistakes that are made (i.e. someone without renal failure who has a creatinine of 10.9; another case of someone with an elevated creatinine, normal LFTs, on hemodialysis but final diagnosis is &#8220;chronic liver disease) and these are only a couple of examples. The point is that we save your asses a lot of time and you don&#8217;t even know it. I made under 10,000 dollars last year and a lot of very good MTs are getting out of the business because it&#8217;s not worth it. The risk is too high, we are concerned and very careful with documentation on people who are NOT our patients and the pay is getting lower all the time. Excuse me if I fail to sympathize with your &#8220;dangerous abbreviation&#8221; complaint. We MTs are responsible for making sure they are expanded properly and that is the last thing we have to complain about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B</title>
		<link>http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/2007/11/do-not-use-these-medical-abbreviations/#comment-42717</link>
		<dc:creator>B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 23:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whitecoatrants.wordpress.com/2007/11/04/do-not-use-these-medical-abbreviations/#comment-42717</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe your not aware that people die all the time from mistakes like this...my neice being one of them]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe your not aware that people die all the time from mistakes like this&#8230;my neice being one of them</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyrone</title>
		<link>http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/2007/11/do-not-use-these-medical-abbreviations/#comment-6677</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyrone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 00:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whitecoatrants.wordpress.com/2007/11/04/do-not-use-these-medical-abbreviations/#comment-6677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IF, and this is a big IF, ALL hostitals under JHACO&#039;s jurisdiction would simply say &#039;no&#039; to the rules, what do you think would happen. 

It&#039;s like the movie Bug&#039;s Life when the ants resisted the request of the grasshoppers.  We doctors, hospitals, nurses, etc... have the country by the short and curlies but we cower at every request JHACO and Medicare makes.  

Imagine if we ALL turned away unfunded, not sick patients from our ERs.  Imagine if we ALL walked out of every single ER for one hour one day.  Don&#039;t you believe that kind of unity would be felt and heard in Washington?  Well, it&#039;s too good to think about because whenever I share it with a colleague, all I hear is fear that the profession might get in trouble.  We&#039;re already in trouble.  We are being paid less and less for more and more stringent guidelines, etc....  EMTALA violates anti-slavery laws, but we just keep doing what they tell us.

We just sit back, huddle in our stupid specialist groups, argue amongst ourselves, and never go after the enemy.  Meanwhile, the AMA, which neither represents the interests of patients or doctors, prances around with idiotic proposals that decay the enjoyment of practicing medicine in this country.  

Do you think some FMG who grew up in calcutta is going to care about decreased reimbursements?  I don&#039;t know because I can&#039;t understand him.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IF, and this is a big IF, ALL hostitals under JHACO&#8217;s jurisdiction would simply say &#8216;no&#8217; to the rules, what do you think would happen. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s like the movie Bug&#8217;s Life when the ants resisted the request of the grasshoppers.  We doctors, hospitals, nurses, etc&#8230; have the country by the short and curlies but we cower at every request JHACO and Medicare makes.  </p>
<p>Imagine if we ALL turned away unfunded, not sick patients from our ERs.  Imagine if we ALL walked out of every single ER for one hour one day.  Don&#8217;t you believe that kind of unity would be felt and heard in Washington?  Well, it&#8217;s too good to think about because whenever I share it with a colleague, all I hear is fear that the profession might get in trouble.  We&#8217;re already in trouble.  We are being paid less and less for more and more stringent guidelines, etc&#8230;.  EMTALA violates anti-slavery laws, but we just keep doing what they tell us.</p>
<p>We just sit back, huddle in our stupid specialist groups, argue amongst ourselves, and never go after the enemy.  Meanwhile, the AMA, which neither represents the interests of patients or doctors, prances around with idiotic proposals that decay the enjoyment of practicing medicine in this country.  </p>
<p>Do you think some FMG who grew up in calcutta is going to care about decreased reimbursements?  I don&#8217;t know because I can&#8217;t understand him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kiko</title>
		<link>http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/2007/11/do-not-use-these-medical-abbreviations/#comment-850</link>
		<dc:creator>Kiko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 02:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whitecoatrants.wordpress.com/2007/11/04/do-not-use-these-medical-abbreviations/#comment-850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Go have life and stop arguing. If your hospital doesn&#039;t get accredited you will either go home or look for another job. Like it or not, you need to do it. Med exec. will beat your lazy *** and you will OBEY hehehehehehhe
Do you understand my English???? If not, look at how and what you write for a pharmacist .... and how many times does he/she call you to correct your silly mistakes. Hallllllloooooo]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go have life and stop arguing. If your hospital doesn&#8217;t get accredited you will either go home or look for another job. Like it or not, you need to do it. Med exec. will beat your lazy *** and you will OBEY hehehehehehhe<br />
Do you understand my English???? If not, look at how and what you write for a pharmacist &#8230;. and how many times does he/she call you to correct your silly mistakes. Hallllllloooooo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R.E.S.</title>
		<link>http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/2007/11/do-not-use-these-medical-abbreviations/#comment-849</link>
		<dc:creator>R.E.S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 19:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whitecoatrants.wordpress.com/2007/11/04/do-not-use-these-medical-abbreviations/#comment-849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For collage, I am doing a research on the ban of medical abbreviations.  I am studying to be a medical coder and biller.  I have a paper due on the errors made because of medical abbreviations.  In my research, I read the White Coat Rants article, and the following blog.  Some of the doctors and others have legitimate complaints.  Medical and pharmaceutical staff should use common sense.  But, wouldn’t you rather error on the side of caution that on the side of carelessness?  I have read a number of cases where misread abbreviations led to serious problems, and death.  There are enough people that die because medicine cannot help them, without having people die unnecessarily.  How many patients die because open heart surgery cannot save them?  How many cancer patients are lost because chemotherapy cannot help them?  How many vehicle accident victims don’t make it because they are to far gone for medical attention to save them?  In light of that, shouldn’t a doctor/nurse/etc. do everything in their power to save the patients that don’t have to die?  It takes more time and effort to write everything out, but this is not about you.  It’s about the people who could loose their lives if the abbreviations are read incorrectly.  Yes, Dr. So-in-so saved a few seconds on the report, but what about the person that died because of it?  What about the things they planned to do yet in their life?  What about their widow, their fatherless or motherless children?  What if it was your wife/husband/child/mother/father/etc. that died from someone’s negligence?

&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I have read a number of cases where misread abbreviations led to serious problems, and death. &lt;/blockquote&gt;
Were the &quot;serious problems and death&quot; due to the *abbreviations* or due to the inadequate medical knowledge of the person making the mistake? Show me evidence that proves a causal connection between abbreviations and bad outcomes where poor medical knowledge is not involved.
You can make all the emotional pleas you want, but if you want to address the facts, you still have not shown how abbreviations alone kill people. I&#039;d like to see evidence of how many fewer deaths and &quot;serious problems&quot; have occurred since this silly mandate was created. Until I see that information, in my eyes JCAHO is benefiting itself by perpetuating a myth. &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For collage, I am doing a research on the ban of medical abbreviations.  I am studying to be a medical coder and biller.  I have a paper due on the errors made because of medical abbreviations.  In my research, I read the White Coat Rants article, and the following blog.  Some of the doctors and others have legitimate complaints.  Medical and pharmaceutical staff should use common sense.  But, wouldn’t you rather error on the side of caution that on the side of carelessness?  I have read a number of cases where misread abbreviations led to serious problems, and death.  There are enough people that die because medicine cannot help them, without having people die unnecessarily.  How many patients die because open heart surgery cannot save them?  How many cancer patients are lost because chemotherapy cannot help them?  How many vehicle accident victims don’t make it because they are to far gone for medical attention to save them?  In light of that, shouldn’t a doctor/nurse/etc. do everything in their power to save the patients that don’t have to die?  It takes more time and effort to write everything out, but this is not about you.  It’s about the people who could loose their lives if the abbreviations are read incorrectly.  Yes, Dr. So-in-so saved a few seconds on the report, but what about the person that died because of it?  What about the things they planned to do yet in their life?  What about their widow, their fatherless or motherless children?  What if it was your wife/husband/child/mother/father/etc. that died from someone’s negligence?</p>
<p><em><strong><br />
<blockquote>I have read a number of cases where misread abbreviations led to serious problems, and death. </p></blockquote>
<p>Were the &#8220;serious problems and death&#8221; due to the *abbreviations* or due to the inadequate medical knowledge of the person making the mistake? Show me evidence that proves a causal connection between abbreviations and bad outcomes where poor medical knowledge is not involved.<br />
You can make all the emotional pleas you want, but if you want to address the facts, you still have not shown how abbreviations alone kill people. I&#8217;d like to see evidence of how many fewer deaths and &#8220;serious problems&#8221; have occurred since this silly mandate was created. Until I see that information, in my eyes JCAHO is benefiting itself by perpetuating a myth. </strong></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Brown, RN</title>
		<link>http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/2007/11/do-not-use-these-medical-abbreviations/#comment-848</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Brown, RN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whitecoatrants.wordpress.com/2007/11/04/do-not-use-these-medical-abbreviations/#comment-848</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Joint Commission can kiss my fat fanny qd and prn....and some of these responders need to take a damn Zoloft and chill out!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joint Commission can kiss my fat fanny qd and prn&#8230;.and some of these responders need to take a damn Zoloft and chill out!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ariel</title>
		<link>http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/2007/11/do-not-use-these-medical-abbreviations/#comment-847</link>
		<dc:creator>Ariel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 03:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whitecoatrants.wordpress.com/2007/11/04/do-not-use-these-medical-abbreviations/#comment-847</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This JOINT commission is simply a bunch of narccissistic lawyers, &quot;healthcare administrators&quot; and the regular quislings among nurses that don&#039;t want to do real work anymore. These people are soooo self-absorbed and egomaniacal that they won&#039;t even smile when they come to &quot;inspect&quot; a place. They came to our magnet hospital and &quot;complained that the flowerbeds outside were a potential harm because there was some dirty soil on te pavement among other stupid things. They make people pee in their pants just for the sheer mention that they are coming.

  Just another bunch of laughable bureaucrats that do about as much to improve healthcare in this country as the US congress.

 And we were even instructed how to talk to them if they asked questions. Goddammit, these people are worse than the KGB.

Another reason to find some other things to do for sure.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This JOINT commission is simply a bunch of narccissistic lawyers, &#8220;healthcare administrators&#8221; and the regular quislings among nurses that don&#8217;t want to do real work anymore. These people are soooo self-absorbed and egomaniacal that they won&#8217;t even smile when they come to &#8220;inspect&#8221; a place. They came to our magnet hospital and &#8220;complained that the flowerbeds outside were a potential harm because there was some dirty soil on te pavement among other stupid things. They make people pee in their pants just for the sheer mention that they are coming.</p>
<p>  Just another bunch of laughable bureaucrats that do about as much to improve healthcare in this country as the US congress.</p>
<p> And we were even instructed how to talk to them if they asked questions. Goddammit, these people are worse than the KGB.</p>
<p>Another reason to find some other things to do for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chicago</title>
		<link>http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/2007/11/do-not-use-these-medical-abbreviations/#comment-846</link>
		<dc:creator>Chicago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whitecoatrants.wordpress.com/2007/11/04/do-not-use-these-medical-abbreviations/#comment-846</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Healthcare Benchmarks Qual Improv. 2007 Nov;14(11):126-8.

Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2007 Sep;33(9):576-83.

J Hosp Med. 2007 Jul;2(4):212-8.

Sentinel Event Alert. 2001 Sep;(23):1-4.

Jt Comm Perspect. 2001 Nov;21(11):10-1.

Really, how hard is it to just write out?

&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;How hard is it - not at all. It just takes more and more time.
Kind of like TJC forcing all pharmacists to confirm all written prescriptions by telephone. How hard would that be? All you&#039;d have to do is dial a phone number and speak to the doc, right? If you&#039;re a practicing pharmacist, you&#039;d know that your productivity would tank and then your boss would give you an ultimatum to shape up or ship out. If you&#039;re not a practicing pharmacist and just carry a clipboard around all day telling everyone else what they do wrong, I don&#039;t really hold much regard for your opinions.
The only citation I could find online was to &lt;a href=&quot;http://psnet.ahrq.gov/public/Brunetti_JCJQPS_2007.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the second article from Luigi Brunetti &lt;/a&gt;who happens to be a pharmacist. This article just proves my point. Look at the case examples.
Case 1 an order is written for &quot;acyclovir (unknown dose) with HD.&quot; The pharmacist interprets the &quot;HD&quot; to be &quot;TID.&quot; Apparently the pharmacist doesn&#039;t contact the physician to ask about the dose and doesn&#039;t check to see whether the dose should be modified with someone in renal failure. Order wasn&#039;t clear and pharmacist didn&#039;t confirm. You can blame the error on &quot;abbreviations&quot; but the root cause of the problem is the physician&#039;s sloppy order and that pharmacist&#039;s lack of knowledge.
Case 2 was a mix-up between &quot;micrograms&quot; and &quot;milligrams.&quot; Neither the nurse nor the pharmacist caught on that the patient was being given ONE THOUSAND times the proper dose of medications. Did they check the proper dose before giving the medication? Doubt it. Lack of knowledge masquerading as &quot;abbreviation error.&quot;
Case 3 involved a patient who was given an MDX/GI cocktail containing lidocaine. The patient was allergic to lidocaine. Nevertheless, the pharmacist prepared the compound and sent it to the patient&#039;s bedside. Did the pharmacist check the patient&#039;s allergies before dispensing the medication? Doubt it. Both physician and nurse stated that they did not know lidocaine was in a GI cocktail. Lack of knowledge masquerading as &quot;abbreviation error.&quot;
You can pull a &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lies,_damned_lies,_and_statistics&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Mark Twain&lt;/a&gt; on the data all you want. The bottom line is that these problems are caused by poor handwriting and by people failing to take the time to learn about the medications they give. If you blindly give 1 gram of Morphine IV piggyback because you misunderstood the Magnesium order, you have no business giving any medication at all. You&#039;re a danger whether the medication is written out or abbreviated.
Maybe the &quot;do not use list&quot; will avert a few medication errors, but the underlying problems will persist. The low morale and disgust for the medical profession caused by the new &quot;directives&quot; the Joint Commission spits out on a regular basis create far more of a danger than me writing &quot;cc&quot; or &quot;TID.&quot;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Healthcare Benchmarks Qual Improv. 2007 Nov;14(11):126-8.</p>
<p>Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2007 Sep;33(9):576-83.</p>
<p>J Hosp Med. 2007 Jul;2(4):212-8.</p>
<p>Sentinel Event Alert. 2001 Sep;(23):1-4.</p>
<p>Jt Comm Perspect. 2001 Nov;21(11):10-1.</p>
<p>Really, how hard is it to just write out?</p>
<p><em><strong>How hard is it &#8211; not at all. It just takes more and more time.<br />
Kind of like TJC forcing all pharmacists to confirm all written prescriptions by telephone. How hard would that be? All you&#8217;d have to do is dial a phone number and speak to the doc, right? If you&#8217;re a practicing pharmacist, you&#8217;d know that your productivity would tank and then your boss would give you an ultimatum to shape up or ship out. If you&#8217;re not a practicing pharmacist and just carry a clipboard around all day telling everyone else what they do wrong, I don&#8217;t really hold much regard for your opinions.<br />
The only citation I could find online was to <a href="http://psnet.ahrq.gov/public/Brunetti_JCJQPS_2007.pdf" rel="nofollow">the second article from Luigi Brunetti </a>who happens to be a pharmacist. This article just proves my point. Look at the case examples.<br />
Case 1 an order is written for &#8220;acyclovir (unknown dose) with HD.&#8221; The pharmacist interprets the &#8220;HD&#8221; to be &#8220;TID.&#8221; Apparently the pharmacist doesn&#8217;t contact the physician to ask about the dose and doesn&#8217;t check to see whether the dose should be modified with someone in renal failure. Order wasn&#8217;t clear and pharmacist didn&#8217;t confirm. You can blame the error on &#8220;abbreviations&#8221; but the root cause of the problem is the physician&#8217;s sloppy order and that pharmacist&#8217;s lack of knowledge.<br />
Case 2 was a mix-up between &#8220;micrograms&#8221; and &#8220;milligrams.&#8221; Neither the nurse nor the pharmacist caught on that the patient was being given ONE THOUSAND times the proper dose of medications. Did they check the proper dose before giving the medication? Doubt it. Lack of knowledge masquerading as &#8220;abbreviation error.&#8221;<br />
Case 3 involved a patient who was given an MDX/GI cocktail containing lidocaine. The patient was allergic to lidocaine. Nevertheless, the pharmacist prepared the compound and sent it to the patient&#8217;s bedside. Did the pharmacist check the patient&#8217;s allergies before dispensing the medication? Doubt it. Both physician and nurse stated that they did not know lidocaine was in a GI cocktail. Lack of knowledge masquerading as &#8220;abbreviation error.&#8221;<br />
You can pull a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lies,_damned_lies,_and_statistics" rel="nofollow">Mark Twain</a> on the data all you want. The bottom line is that these problems are caused by poor handwriting and by people failing to take the time to learn about the medications they give. If you blindly give 1 gram of Morphine IV piggyback because you misunderstood the Magnesium order, you have no business giving any medication at all. You&#8217;re a danger whether the medication is written out or abbreviated.<br />
Maybe the &#8220;do not use list&#8221; will avert a few medication errors, but the underlying problems will persist. The low morale and disgust for the medical profession caused by the new &#8220;directives&#8221; the Joint Commission spits out on a regular basis create far more of a danger than me writing &#8220;cc&#8221; or &#8220;TID.&#8221;</strong></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chicago</title>
		<link>http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/2007/11/do-not-use-these-medical-abbreviations/#comment-845</link>
		<dc:creator>Chicago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 17:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whitecoatrants.wordpress.com/2007/11/04/do-not-use-these-medical-abbreviations/#comment-845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anybody who thinks that only incompetent practitioners misunderstand written directions and abbreviations is completely mistaken.  Everyone is human; everyone makes mistakes.  Hopefully the complainers&#039; own arrogance won&#039;t cause a patient harm because they can&#039;t grow up enough to follow the rules.  JCAHO puts regulations into effect for a reason, not just because they like doing it.
&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;
So give me the hard evidence showing me that the patient harm results from using these &quot;baaaaaad&quot; abbreviations and not from the &lt;a href=&quot;http://whitecoatrants.wordpress.com/2008/01/25/emphasis-on-the-wrong-syllable/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;doctor&#039;s poor handwriting&lt;/a&gt;. If the handwriting sucks, what difference does it make whether something is abbreviated one way or another?
If you don&#039;t have the knowledge to differentiate between proper doses of magnesium and morphine, you shouldn&#039;t be dispensing the medications.
What bothers me more than being called &quot;arrogant&quot; because I chose to highlight the obvious is that some less informed people have apparently taken the Joint Commission&#039;s recommendations hook, line, and sinker without thinking them through. &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lemming#Myths_and_misconceptions&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Watch out for those cliffs&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anybody who thinks that only incompetent practitioners misunderstand written directions and abbreviations is completely mistaken.  Everyone is human; everyone makes mistakes.  Hopefully the complainers&#8217; own arrogance won&#8217;t cause a patient harm because they can&#8217;t grow up enough to follow the rules.  JCAHO puts regulations into effect for a reason, not just because they like doing it.<br />
<em><strong><br />
So give me the hard evidence showing me that the patient harm results from using these &#8220;baaaaaad&#8221; abbreviations and not from the <a href="http://whitecoatrants.wordpress.com/2008/01/25/emphasis-on-the-wrong-syllable/" rel="nofollow">doctor&#8217;s poor handwriting</a>. If the handwriting sucks, what difference does it make whether something is abbreviated one way or another?<br />
If you don&#8217;t have the knowledge to differentiate between proper doses of magnesium and morphine, you shouldn&#8217;t be dispensing the medications.<br />
What bothers me more than being called &#8220;arrogant&#8221; because I chose to highlight the obvious is that some less informed people have apparently taken the Joint Commission&#8217;s recommendations hook, line, and sinker without thinking them through. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lemming#Myths_and_misconceptions" rel="nofollow">Watch out for those cliffs</a>.</strong></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
