<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Health Care</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/2009/01/no-health-care/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/2009/01/no-health-care/</link>
	<description>A blog from inside the emergency department</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 07:07:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobbiejoe</title>
		<link>http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/2009/01/no-health-care/#comment-17831</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobbiejoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 20:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/?p=1972#comment-17831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ALLL that I really have to say, with great certainty, is that I want the right to choose for myself. I don&#039;t want the government taking over every aspect of my life! I am a recent cancer survivor. The company that I work for, God bless them, helped me by keeping me on their insurance two years ago until I was done with treatment. I have returned to work a little over a year ago, surviving surgery and chemo for colon cancer that we, as a community, came together of our own accord to make it work. 
Approximately half of my paycheck each week goes to my insurance costs (my health as well as life that I had bought into before cancer) and I am GRATEFUL and GLAD to pay, because I know the kind of treatment that I am getting (life saving!) vs the young, single mom at my job who has cancer throughout her body and two young children WHOSE on medical (and who runs that, huh... isn&#039;t it the government?). They won&#039;t even give her her test results half of the time, because THEY HAVEN&quot;T BEEN PAID FOR! By the time she is really treated (which by the way, she is being cared for not by an oncologist but a family MD), she might be dead! She is presently at stage three… for about a year.. If they can&#039;t fix that care, why would I want them to take over mine? 
I am just saying. You decide.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ALLL that I really have to say, with great certainty, is that I want the right to choose for myself. I don&#8217;t want the government taking over every aspect of my life! I am a recent cancer survivor. The company that I work for, God bless them, helped me by keeping me on their insurance two years ago until I was done with treatment. I have returned to work a little over a year ago, surviving surgery and chemo for colon cancer that we, as a community, came together of our own accord to make it work.<br />
Approximately half of my paycheck each week goes to my insurance costs (my health as well as life that I had bought into before cancer) and I am GRATEFUL and GLAD to pay, because I know the kind of treatment that I am getting (life saving!) vs the young, single mom at my job who has cancer throughout her body and two young children WHOSE on medical (and who runs that, huh&#8230; isn&#8217;t it the government?). They won&#8217;t even give her her test results half of the time, because THEY HAVEN&#8221;T BEEN PAID FOR! By the time she is really treated (which by the way, she is being cared for not by an oncologist but a family MD), she might be dead! She is presently at stage three… for about a year.. If they can&#8217;t fix that care, why would I want them to take over mine?<br />
I am just saying. You decide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobbiejoe</title>
		<link>http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/2009/01/no-health-care/#comment-17829</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobbiejoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 20:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/?p=1972#comment-17829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That is a lot of assuming... I am just saying. You make the mother sound stupid instead of, oh I don&#039;t know, DESPERATE?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a lot of assuming&#8230; I am just saying. You make the mother sound stupid instead of, oh I don&#8217;t know, DESPERATE?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobbiejoe</title>
		<link>http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/2009/01/no-health-care/#comment-17828</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobbiejoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 20:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/?p=1972#comment-17828</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Soooo are you for socialized government as well then? that is likely the next step, you realize rite?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Soooo are you for socialized government as well then? that is likely the next step, you realize rite?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curt Sampson</title>
		<link>http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/2009/01/no-health-care/#comment-6713</link>
		<dc:creator>Curt Sampson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 11:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/?p=1972#comment-6713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If I&#039;m getting the general gist of your comments on the Canadian hospital issue correct, you&#039;ve quite wrongly misinterpreted the article.

The decision was not made by the hospital in question; the article states clearly that it was made by &quot;the Winnipeg Regional Health Authority.&quot;  So what we have here is not one hospital dumping on another, but the management of a group of hospitals trying to concentrate its emergency surgery services in one of a group of hospitals in an area. Second, there appear to be plausible reasons for this: their surgeons tend to be specializing further, presumably meaning that concentrating them together gives a greater likelyhood that any random patient rolled in off the street will get the best doctor for his problem. That same management has also done this in other areas previously, though it&#039;s not clear that they examined whether or not this works before implementing it in this particular case.

Responding to another commenter, the &quot;needless transportation within a city for ’standard’ emergency surgeries&quot; thing may or may not be an issue; I do note that they said &quot;re-route,&quot; implying that this applies only to patients already being transported.

And one last minor point: there was only one &quot;protester,&quot; a local MP. I&#039;m wondering if he wasn&#039;t just doing this as a publicity stunt.

cjs@cynic.net]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I&#8217;m getting the general gist of your comments on the Canadian hospital issue correct, you&#8217;ve quite wrongly misinterpreted the article.</p>
<p>The decision was not made by the hospital in question; the article states clearly that it was made by &#8220;the Winnipeg Regional Health Authority.&#8221;  So what we have here is not one hospital dumping on another, but the management of a group of hospitals trying to concentrate its emergency surgery services in one of a group of hospitals in an area. Second, there appear to be plausible reasons for this: their surgeons tend to be specializing further, presumably meaning that concentrating them together gives a greater likelyhood that any random patient rolled in off the street will get the best doctor for his problem. That same management has also done this in other areas previously, though it&#8217;s not clear that they examined whether or not this works before implementing it in this particular case.</p>
<p>Responding to another commenter, the &#8220;needless transportation within a city for ’standard’ emergency surgeries&#8221; thing may or may not be an issue; I do note that they said &#8220;re-route,&#8221; implying that this applies only to patients already being transported.</p>
<p>And one last minor point: there was only one &#8220;protester,&#8221; a local MP. I&#8217;m wondering if he wasn&#8217;t just doing this as a publicity stunt.</p>
<p><a href="mailto:cjs@cynic.net">cjs@cynic.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is there really a physician shortage? &#124; Telecom News</title>
		<link>http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/2009/01/no-health-care/#comment-6699</link>
		<dc:creator>Is there really a physician shortage? &#124; Telecom News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 05:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/?p=1972#comment-6699</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Emergency physician WhiteCoat cites a number of stories where patients are not receiving timely access to care. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Emergency physician WhiteCoat cites a number of stories where patients are not receiving timely access to care. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is there really a physician shortage? &#124; First Aid Ready!</title>
		<link>http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/2009/01/no-health-care/#comment-6683</link>
		<dc:creator>Is there really a physician shortage? &#124; First Aid Ready!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 07:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/?p=1972#comment-6683</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Emergency physician WhiteCoat cites a carouse of stories where patients are not receiving auspicious access to mindfulness. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Emergency physician WhiteCoat cites a carouse of stories where patients are not receiving auspicious access to mindfulness. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/2009/01/no-health-care/#comment-6673</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 21:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/?p=1972#comment-6673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By the way, you often hear physicians commenting about a &quot;shortage&quot; of physicians if you don&#039;t do this or that for them.  How many physicians, and of what type, constitutes an appropriate number?  Has this been determined so that the declaration of a &quot;shortage&quot; can actually mean something?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, you often hear physicians commenting about a &#8220;shortage&#8221; of physicians if you don&#8217;t do this or that for them.  How many physicians, and of what type, constitutes an appropriate number?  Has this been determined so that the declaration of a &#8220;shortage&#8221; can actually mean something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/2009/01/no-health-care/#comment-6671</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 21:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/?p=1972#comment-6671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If tort reform boiled down to that California would be flush with physicians - as it has had a draconian system in place for decades.  Try again on that.

There is nothing &quot;free market&quot; about legislators arbitrarily deciding the value of an injury.  But when you take away people&#039;s right to recovery, and make vague claims about promising more physicians and specialists everywhere if you get your reform, and you don&#039;t deliver, you are treating healthcare as a right.  You sell tort reform as promising more care and more care and more care.  That makes people expect it when you get them to pass it.  Problem is, you can&#039;t deliver because no specialist really wants to go to rural BFE to practice.  So people naturally ask themselves why they aren&#039;t getting this &quot;right&quot; after they gave you protection.

Nothing illogical about that conclusion.  The long and short is that unless you physicians stop doing your insurers dirty work for little to no benefit to you, and start focusing on your manner of compensation, you&#039;re going to get your tort &quot;reform&quot;, because along with universal health care we&#039;ll get a workers comp style no fault system.  Then you can rave about how great European systems are because you&#039;ll have first hand experience!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If tort reform boiled down to that California would be flush with physicians &#8211; as it has had a draconian system in place for decades.  Try again on that.</p>
<p>There is nothing &#8220;free market&#8221; about legislators arbitrarily deciding the value of an injury.  But when you take away people&#8217;s right to recovery, and make vague claims about promising more physicians and specialists everywhere if you get your reform, and you don&#8217;t deliver, you are treating healthcare as a right.  You sell tort reform as promising more care and more care and more care.  That makes people expect it when you get them to pass it.  Problem is, you can&#8217;t deliver because no specialist really wants to go to rural BFE to practice.  So people naturally ask themselves why they aren&#8217;t getting this &#8220;right&#8221; after they gave you protection.</p>
<p>Nothing illogical about that conclusion.  The long and short is that unless you physicians stop doing your insurers dirty work for little to no benefit to you, and start focusing on your manner of compensation, you&#8217;re going to get your tort &#8220;reform&#8221;, because along with universal health care we&#8217;ll get a workers comp style no fault system.  Then you can rave about how great European systems are because you&#8217;ll have first hand experience!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melanie Fine</title>
		<link>http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/2009/01/no-health-care/#comment-6666</link>
		<dc:creator>Melanie Fine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 18:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/?p=1972#comment-6666</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m sorry.  I was replying to NurseK&#039;s assumptions.  I agree with you.  Our insurance is not insurance when it becomes an obstacle to receiving appropriate care.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry.  I was replying to NurseK&#8217;s assumptions.  I agree with you.  Our insurance is not insurance when it becomes an obstacle to receiving appropriate care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GingerB</title>
		<link>http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/2009/01/no-health-care/#comment-6665</link>
		<dc:creator>GingerB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 18:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/?p=1972#comment-6665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Her kid didn&#039;t end up being sick!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Her kid didn&#8217;t end up being sick!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
