<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Assuming the Worst</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/2009/03/assuming-the-worst/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/2009/03/assuming-the-worst/</link>
	<description>A blog from inside the emergency department</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:07:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grand Rounds &#8212; When things go awry &#124; Hospital Health Care</title>
		<link>http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/2009/03/assuming-the-worst/#comment-7661</link>
		<dc:creator>Grand Rounds &#8212; When things go awry &#124; Hospital Health Care</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 23:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/?p=2262#comment-7661</guid>
		<description>[...] Coat uses his experience from another part of life to illustrate that sometimes patients get it wrong. What appears to be an error is not always an [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Coat uses his experience from another part of life to illustrate that sometimes patients get it wrong. What appears to be an error is not always an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bianca Castafiore</title>
		<link>http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/2009/03/assuming-the-worst/#comment-7581</link>
		<dc:creator>Bianca Castafiore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/?p=2262#comment-7581</guid>
		<description>Not to hog the comment section -- but with my first cup of coffee, I read this op-ed and the assessment of &quot;experts&quot; fairly leapt off the page! 
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/26/opinion/26Kristof.html?_r=1&amp;em</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to hog the comment section &#8212; but with my first cup of coffee, I read this op-ed and the assessment of &#8220;experts&#8221; fairly leapt off the page!<br />
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/26/opinion/26Kristof.html?_r=1&#038;em" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/26/opinion/26Kristof.html?_r=1&#038;em</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bianca Castafiore</title>
		<link>http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/2009/03/assuming-the-worst/#comment-7573</link>
		<dc:creator>Bianca Castafiore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 03:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/?p=2262#comment-7573</guid>
		<description>Okay, I&#039;ll sing off-key!  This post felt like condescension of the highest order. The rhetoric about &quot;experts&quot;?  An adroit rhetorical bait-and-switch.  I gagged on the persuasion.

All things being even, including divergent &quot;expert&quot; opinions?  Never substitute someone else&#039;s judgment for your own. Yes, with the obvious provisos of respect (not deference) and openmindedness (again, not deference).

All that patting on the head has messed up my hair, harumph.  

I know I&#039;ll love the next one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, I&#8217;ll sing off-key!  This post felt like condescension of the highest order. The rhetoric about &#8220;experts&#8221;?  An adroit rhetorical bait-and-switch.  I gagged on the persuasion.</p>
<p>All things being even, including divergent &#8220;expert&#8221; opinions?  Never substitute someone else&#8217;s judgment for your own. Yes, with the obvious provisos of respect (not deference) and openmindedness (again, not deference).</p>
<p>All that patting on the head has messed up my hair, harumph.  </p>
<p>I know I&#8217;ll love the next one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Kennerly</title>
		<link>http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/2009/03/assuming-the-worst/#comment-7552</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Kennerly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 02:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/?p=2262#comment-7552</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t disagree with your medication analogy, that&#039;s what I was trying to convey. From the perspective of the mechanic/doctor, your call to the brake shop is analogous to a patient calling about the expiration date of liquid-suspension omeprazole -- beyond the layperson, but simple and easy to answer for the professional. From the perspective of patients, though, your call was analogous to asking a doctor on the phone &quot;did they screw up my angioplasty?&quot; A doctor has good reason to say &quot;I think you should come in.&quot; Unlike brakes, most medical problems can&#039;t be solved on the phone and, worse, most medical problems will never be fully understood by the patients.

I&#039;m not faulting doctors for this problem, just pointing it out as a difference. For good reason, patients simply can&#039;t get a quick answer when they want a second opinion or to confirm something from another source. It&#039;s a tedious, difficult, often expensive process, one that often leaves patients just as bewildered when they started. 

This problem isn&#039;t unique to medicine, all professions have it; just today I spend a good deal of time talking a client out of their belief that the judge in the case (who I&#039;ve known for years as being very fair) was biased against them because so-and-so&#039;s relative works in the courthouse. 

I don&#039;t have a brilliant solution to this problem, nor do I think it dampens the core point of your fine post, just pointing it out as different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t disagree with your medication analogy, that&#8217;s what I was trying to convey. From the perspective of the mechanic/doctor, your call to the brake shop is analogous to a patient calling about the expiration date of liquid-suspension omeprazole &#8212; beyond the layperson, but simple and easy to answer for the professional. From the perspective of patients, though, your call was analogous to asking a doctor on the phone &#8220;did they screw up my angioplasty?&#8221; A doctor has good reason to say &#8220;I think you should come in.&#8221; Unlike brakes, most medical problems can&#8217;t be solved on the phone and, worse, most medical problems will never be fully understood by the patients.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not faulting doctors for this problem, just pointing it out as a difference. For good reason, patients simply can&#8217;t get a quick answer when they want a second opinion or to confirm something from another source. It&#8217;s a tedious, difficult, often expensive process, one that often leaves patients just as bewildered when they started. </p>
<p>This problem isn&#8217;t unique to medicine, all professions have it; just today I spend a good deal of time talking a client out of their belief that the judge in the case (who I&#8217;ve known for years as being very fair) was biased against them because so-and-so&#8217;s relative works in the courthouse. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have a brilliant solution to this problem, nor do I think it dampens the core point of your fine post, just pointing it out as different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SeaSpray</title>
		<link>http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/2009/03/assuming-the-worst/#comment-7550</link>
		<dc:creator>SeaSpray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 00:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/?p=2262#comment-7550</guid>
		<description>I agree.

This was a terrific post WC!  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.</p>
<p>This was a terrific post WC!  <img src='http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WhiteCoat</title>
		<link>http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/2009/03/assuming-the-worst/#comment-7547</link>
		<dc:creator>WhiteCoat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 21:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/?p=2262#comment-7547</guid>
		<description>At the risk of starting an argument, I&#039;m going to disagree with your analogy. 
Commenting on a part is like a medical professional describing side effects of a medication. 
Your example is more along the lines of someone asking &quot;Why does my car make this grinding noise when I drive?&quot;
The other issue is that my intuition tells me there are few if any multimillion dollar judgment against parts supply shops for giving wrong advice about a part (I&#039;ll freely admit I&#039;m wrong and apologize if you can cite a couple). However, giving erroneous medical advice over the telephone is commonly cited as a liability for medical providers. The standard reply for advice in our ED now is &quot;We can&#039;t give advice over the telephone. If you come here, a doctor would be happy to see you.&quot;
I agree with your statement about why many people seek out attorneys. I have friends and acquaintances come to me frequently to ask about medical issues that their own doctors will not discuss with them. 
Of course I have them sign a 11 page waiver and disclaimer before I talk to them, but that&#039;s another story. 
;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the risk of starting an argument, I&#8217;m going to disagree with your analogy.<br />
Commenting on a part is like a medical professional describing side effects of a medication.<br />
Your example is more along the lines of someone asking &#8220;Why does my car make this grinding noise when I drive?&#8221;<br />
The other issue is that my intuition tells me there are few if any multimillion dollar judgment against parts supply shops for giving wrong advice about a part (I&#8217;ll freely admit I&#8217;m wrong and apologize if you can cite a couple). However, giving erroneous medical advice over the telephone is commonly cited as a liability for medical providers. The standard reply for advice in our ED now is &#8220;We can&#8217;t give advice over the telephone. If you come here, a doctor would be happy to see you.&#8221;<br />
I agree with your statement about why many people seek out attorneys. I have friends and acquaintances come to me frequently to ask about medical issues that their own doctors will not discuss with them.<br />
Of course I have them sign a 11 page waiver and disclaimer before I talk to them, but that&#8217;s another story.<br />
 <img src='http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WhiteCoat</title>
		<link>http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/2009/03/assuming-the-worst/#comment-7546</link>
		<dc:creator>WhiteCoat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 21:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/?p=2262#comment-7546</guid>
		<description>See - I&#039;m learning more about trucks every day! Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See &#8211; I&#8217;m learning more about trucks every day! Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WhiteCoat</title>
		<link>http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/2009/03/assuming-the-worst/#comment-7545</link>
		<dc:creator>WhiteCoat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 21:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/?p=2262#comment-7545</guid>
		<description>Good point. I would have been at the dealership swinging a baseball bat at someone&#039;s knees by the next morning. 
A pet peeve of mine is when medical &quot;experts&quot; give opinions about issues on which they have little knowledge. Part of our job as the non-expert is not to blindly rely on the expert opinion, but also to examine the bona fides of the person giving the opinion. 
The title &quot;Dr.&quot; doesn&#039;t make one an expert in all branches of medicine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point. I would have been at the dealership swinging a baseball bat at someone&#8217;s knees by the next morning.<br />
A pet peeve of mine is when medical &#8220;experts&#8221; give opinions about issues on which they have little knowledge. Part of our job as the non-expert is not to blindly rely on the expert opinion, but also to examine the bona fides of the person giving the opinion.<br />
The title &#8220;Dr.&#8221; doesn&#8217;t make one an expert in all branches of medicine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WhiteCoat</title>
		<link>http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/2009/03/assuming-the-worst/#comment-7542</link>
		<dc:creator>WhiteCoat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 19:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/?p=2262#comment-7542</guid>
		<description>Dang. Wish I had thought of that one ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dang. Wish I had thought of that one &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the psycho therapist</title>
		<link>http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/2009/03/assuming-the-worst/#comment-7535</link>
		<dc:creator>the psycho therapist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/?p=2262#comment-7535</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t find myself in the chorus all too often but I certainly agree with the majority of commentators here, WC: this post was damn fine and an excellent example of the need to pay attention to the mind.

Yum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t find myself in the chorus all too often but I certainly agree with the majority of commentators here, WC: this post was damn fine and an excellent example of the need to pay attention to the mind.</p>
<p>Yum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

