WhiteCoat

Archive for March, 2009

Liar Liar

Thursday, March 12th, 2009

liar-liarGiving false identifying information may seem like a good idea when you get brought in by ambulance after getting your ass beat in a bar brawl that you started.

After all, there’s no way to track you down if you don’t have any ID, right? Free stitches. Free x-rays. Free pain medications. And all of those dimwits in the ED are required by law to treat you. Dudette, you’re golden.

Unfortunately, there would be a little problem if the ED doc was having a bad day. Let’s just say that he missed a fracture on your neck x-rays … an unstable fracture. One that could pith you if you twist your neck the wrong way. You need further care.

Then let’s assume that the radiologist’s note about the missed fracture got put in front of me with your disconnected “phone number” and your fake address. I would have no way of contacting you to let you know to come back.

Some might call it Darwinism at work.

Then …

When someone lives in a town 40 miles away and just happens to come to your ED for the worst back pain they’ve had in a long time and they just happen to be allergic to NSAIDs, Ultram, and Flexeril, it tends to set off little bells in the back of an ED physician’s head.

But there were no previous visits to our hospital and we called the hospital from the town where the patient lives. No history of any ED visits there, either. I check the online state database for controlled substance prescriptions and there’s no history of any narcotics being prescribed to him.

Those ED nurses have pretty good memories, though. So when one of the ED nurses sees you walking to the bathroom and says “I haven’t seen HIM around here for about a year,” you’re busted. “Oh yeah, that’s Johnny So-and-So. Let me guess – back pain?”

Registering under a fake name. We pull up his real name on the state database and there are pages of narcotics prescriptions from hospitals all over the area.

Looks like you’re getting Tylenol … number three for your back.

I’ve decided that I’m taking pictures of any patients who don’t provide picture identification when they register and including those pictures on the chart.

I’ve also decided that I’m going to get a stamp that goes on every prescription: “NOT TO BE FILLED without state-issued picture identification.”

$9.50 well spent.

Mystery Syndrome

Wednesday, March 11th, 2009

It happened twice in a recent shift, but there’s no name for it.

Patients decide to go to the hospital. Usually they’re feeling weak.
They get into the car and get driven to the hospital (if patients drive themselves to the hospital, by definition this syndrome cannot occur)
By the time the patient reaches the hospital, they are too weak to get out of the car.
The person driving them must then park the car (usually in an area that blocks ambulances), come into the hospital, and request that someone come out to the car with a wheelchair to get the patient into the hospital. During the drive to the hospital, some patients become so weak that they need to be lifted or dragged out of the car.
Then an amazing thing occurs.
Once inside the hospital, a significant majority of the patients will stand up to get undressed. Some even walk to the bathroom.

I was going to call this syndrome AWWTED – Acute Weakness When Taken to the Emergency Department, but I opted for a more “medical” sounding syndrome:

I’m calling it ATATPA – Acute Transient Accompanied Transloculatory Paralytic Attacks.

They are paralytic attacks that happen suddenly, go away quickly, and only occur when the patient is driven to the ED.

Now if we could only find a medication to treat this at home …

Go Ahead And Stop

Tuesday, March 10th, 2009

While an abscess probably isn’t an “emergency” within the strict definition of the term, it is still something that needs to be lanced and drained so that it can heal.

As a side note, many abscesses, once drained, do not require antibiotic treatment. They get better on their own with the drainage. See sample articles here and here.

Women are predisposed to a certain type of abscess called a Bartholin abscess (link contains graphic pictures) which occurs, as SeaSpray would say, in Bajingoland.

Draining an abscess is painful. Draining an abscess in Bajingoland is more painful. That’s why we inject lidocaine into the area to numb things up before we proceed.

So the nurse gets the patients into stirrups and I start to examine the abscess. I lightly palpate the area to see the extent of the abscess.

“OK, you’re going to feel me press gently on the area to see how big the abscess is.”
“Stop, stop. I don’t want to do this.”
“Without examining you, I’m not going to be able to help you very much.”
“OK. Go ahead.”

I gently press on the area for a second.
“Ow. Ow. No. Stop! That hurts.”

“I understand it is painful. I’m trying to be as gentle as I can, but I need to see how big the abscess is before I can help you.”
“OK. I can take it. Go ahead.”

I grab a syringe with lidocaine in it. “I’m going to shoot a little medicine into the area to numb it up so it doesn’t hurt so much.”
“Ow. Ow. Ow. I don’t want to do this any more. Take the needle out NOW!”

That was it. I could just see her going to the hospital administrators or to the police and saying that I was inappropriately touching her down there without her permission. Fortunately, the nurse was watching everything, but it was still a hassle I no longer wanted to deal with.
So I told her “I’m going to refer you to a gynecologist to drain this. I don’t feel comfortable doing it.”
“But it HURTS!”
“I understand that. I told you that I was going to numb it up, but you told me to take the needle out. And now you’ve told me not to touch you three different times.”
“OK, go ahead. Let’s get it over with.”
“I think it’s better that you see a gynecologist to do this for you.”
“So you’re going to leave me in pain?”
“Not at all. I’ll give you some pain medication to take until your appointment.”

Then the bombshell …
“Why are you refusing to take care of me?”

I wish I had a tape recorder in the room. This is just one of those situations that can be twisted to make you look bad no matter what you do.
There’s no way I’ll come out of this encounter looking good.

Teamwork

Monday, March 9th, 2009

This is a sad story, but it gives a glimpse of the teamwork that goes on in the emergency department when multiple traumas are brought in at once. Things can get overwhelming quite quickly if you don’t have the resources.

Don’t miss my days at the trauma center one bit.

Obamas’ Law Licenses

Monday, March 9th, 2009

I don’t usually pay much attention to politicking, but I was surfing the internet when I read a blog post about how one person feels that medical care at Duke Medical is approaching the level of socialized medicine.
On the links I saw another blog named “Attorneys Don’t Advocate” and I clicked over to that blog. There, I saw an article about Michelle Obama. The article was titled “What “court order” prevents Mrs. Obama from practicing law?”

The author checked the site that licenses attorneys in Illinois and found something peculiar. Mr. Obama is listed as having “voluntarily retired” in 2008. However, Mrs. Obama is no longer licensed to practice law due to a “court ordered inactive status” that occurred 4 years after she was admitted to the Illinois bar.

See below.

barack

michelle

This doesn’t appear to be the normal wording that the licensing body uses to report lapses in registration. I did some random searches for other lawyers and the language that consistently appeared when someone let their registration lapse was the following:

lapse1

I did a lot of searches under multiple different surnames and didn’t find one that stated “court ordered inactive status.”

Then I did an internet search for “Michelle Obama Law License” and found other articles:
Snopes
Politics Blog #1
Conspiracy Theory between Obamas and Blagojevich

No one can seem to figure out what the court order involved.

Anyone have any other insights??

Another Article About Canadian EDs

Sunday, March 8th, 2009

This one is from the Edmonton Journal.
People die in their emergency department waiting rooms, also.
People don’t have access to medications they need and have to pay out of their pockets for expensive care.

Will a socialized system be better for the US?
Draw your own conclusions.

Decreasing Your Chance of Stroke

Sunday, March 8th, 2009

According to a February 19 article in the BMJ Online in which 20,000 patients were followed for 11 years, four factors significantly affected the study participants’ risk of having a stroke.

Smoking, physical inactivity, drinking no alcohol or more than 14 drinks per week, and not eating fruit and vegetables increased study participants’ risk of stroke from 1.15 times to 2.31 times – depending on how many of the four activities participants did and did not engage in.

The study was a little weak in that it was based on a survey where the questions could have led to misleading data. For example, to determine smoking, the survey questions asked “Have you ever smoked as much as one cigarette a day for as long as a year?” and “Do you smoke cigarettes now?” Those patients who engaged in smoking/quitting cycles might not have been picked up by the survey, and those who smoked lightly for a couple of years as a teenager but quit decades ago would still have been counted as “smokers.”
In addition, the study used serum Vitamin C levels as a surrogate marker of fruit/vegetable intake.

While not the best data, the results still give you something to think about.

Stop smoking, have a beer after work, get off your butt and eat your veggies.

Hat tip to Medscape CME.

Parallels That Diverge

Saturday, March 7th, 2009

Medical Justice is an innovative program run by Dr. Jeffrey Segal.

Basically, Medical Justice is the “big stick” doctors carry if they are sued. The service monitors the plaintiff attorneys and the plaintiff expert witnesses and will pursue counterclaims against the attorneys and/or expert witnesses when appropriate. You can read more about what the service offers here.

I have seen that lately Medical Justice is catching a lot of heat due to its anti-defamation service — a contract in which patients agree not to post defamatory statements about the physician on the internet. If the patient doesn’t sign the contract, then the contract gives the physician a chance to decide whether or not to agree to treat the patient. A couple of representative articles about the service were in USA Today and ZDNet.

Medical Justice’s idea has been called “an attack on First Amendment rights,”  an “almost comical attempt to hold back the tide,” and flat out “repulsive.”

It is an “attack on First Amendment rights” when doctors want patients to sign contracts to prevent patients from making derogatory statements on the internet.
Yet no one says much when the Florida Bar thwarted a Florida Constitutional amendment limiting contingency fees by collectively forcing clients to sign a waiver of the rights afforded by Florida Constitutional amendment in order to receive legal representation.
And … when doctors created a web site listing patients who had previously sued other doctors, it was deemed “mean-spirited,” “blacklisting,” a “denial of medical care,” and caused a public uproar to the point that the web site had to be shut down.

Why the disparity?

Bitter Irony

Friday, March 6th, 2009

We’ve had a run on suicidal patients engaging in self-destructive behavior, lately.

First there was the man whose consumption of alcohol had in turn consumed him. He came in a shell of his former self, upset that he had no home, no job, no money, and no wife – all a result of his relationship with the bottle. He had nothing to live for but his bottle and even the bottle was starting to fail him. He truly wanted to die.

Then, just as we had whisked one suicidal person off to the psychiatry floor, another one came to take his place. A young woman with two infant children and 7 months pregnant with a third was upset because her two current children had been taken away from her by the state. She drank some alcohol, then took a “bottle” of her friend’s Wellbutrin (which later ended up being “a few pills”) in a suicide attempt. She also had plenty of drug paraphernalia in her purse. The track marks on her right arm showed that she was a lefty and the insulin syringes in her pocket contained material much too dark and viscous to be used for diabetes.
She was in a rage yelling at everyone one minute and then sobbing uncontrollably the next.
When asked about the last time she used cocaine, she indignantly screamed that she did not use cocaine. I held up a crack pipe that came out of her jacket pocket.

“It’s a meth pipe, duh.”

She bawled as she told us how she had recently become addicted to crystal meth. I sat there with a blank stare on my face thinking for a second how her pretty white teeth probably won’t remain that way.
She refused to drink charcoal recommended by the poison control center, so we inserted an NG tube into her stomach to get the charcoal into her system.
Then she began bawling again, demanding to know whether the charcoal or the NG tube would hurt her unborn baby.
The irony in her question really made me sad. From her age, it probably wasn’t too long ago that she was getting dressed up for her high school prom and her parents were proudly fussing over her hair, taking pictures, and staying up worrying about whether she’d be safe that night. Now she too was a shell of her former self.

“Your baby’s going to be fine. Don’t worry about her. Get some rest, now” I calmly told her as the nurse gave her a sedative.

Treating all those “shells” has a way of getting you down sometimes.

Warning Labels – Just Don’t Puke

Thursday, March 5th, 2009

nauseated-vomiting-manIn less than 24 hours, Phenergan will no longer be available in one of the largest teaching hospitals in our area. Because of the decision of 6 appointed justices in our US Supreme Court, the hospital is removing all of the Phenergan in the hospital’s stock.

Thus continues the assault on many of the antiemetic stalwarts that we have been using for decades.

Bendectin was the first antiemetic to go the way of the dodo bird after famous plaintiff attorney Melvin Belli sued Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals. No credible evidence was ever found that Bendectin caused birth defects as the plaintiff attorneys alleged.
Droperidol was another great nausea medicine that got the FDA’s dreaded “black box.”
Then the FDA went after Tigan suppositories.
Compazine was next to get the dreaded “black box” kiss of death.
Just last week, Reglan joined the “black box” club due to a risk of tardive dyskinesia.

Now Phenergan is going to take a hit. After the publicity, many doctors and hospitals will be afraid to use it.

It’s just amazing that the medical profession has been poisoning patients with all of these medications for decades and just now we’re finding out about it.

Luckily, we still have Zofran and other 5-HT3 receptor antagonists – if patients can afford it.

I wrote a prescription for 12 Zofran ODT tablets for a patient who was vomiting last week. The pharmacist called me and said that the prescription would cost $260 and it wasn’t covered on the patient’s insurance. Could I change it to something else?

I wasn’t willing to take the chance if the patient had a bad outcome.

Defensive medicine strikes again. Avoid the bad outcome.

I wrote about the Wyeth case here and here. I’m by no means a staunch drug manufacturer supporter, but pretend that you’re running a manufacturing company. What are you supposed to do with your drug labels now? Overlawyered.com has a summary of opinions about the Supreme Court’s decision as well as a link to the published opinion.

The product labeling for Phenergan had the following language in it:

phenergan-warning1

I skimmed the 80 page US Supreme Court opinion and it appears that the majority believed that “Wyeth could have unilaterally added a stronger warning about IV-push administration.” Good thinking. Now you’ve just opened the legal floodgates to every Tom, Dick and Harry who has ever had a bad outcome from taking a medication. All they have to claim is that the warnings on the medication bottle “weren’t strong enough” and they’ve got the opinions of six Supreme Court justices to guide them on their quest for independent wealth at the expense of a drug manufacturer.

Extending the Supreme Court’s logic puts every pharmaceutical manufacturer on notice that they must discover each and every way someone could possibly misuse their product and specifically warn the public not to use the product in that manner.

Don’t pour Phenergan in electric sockets – it could start a fire and burn down your house
Don’t feed Phenergan to your goldfish – it could burn their scales off and give you emotional distress
Don’t gargle with Phenergan – it could cause caustic burns to your throat and you could get disfiguring burns and you could suffocate to death
Don’t mix Phenergan with Frosted Flakes – it could cause an exothermic reaction with the Frosted Flakes, resulting in nasal irritation if you breathe the fumes

Actually, I created a Supreme Court-approved label that all pharmaceutical companies could use when they decide to manufacture medications. I’ll bet that some companies will find it very helpful:

supreme-court-friendly-warning-label1

If this label makes you feel nauseous, be careful.

There aren’t that many antiemetics left that doctors will be willing to prescribe to you.

UPDATE MARCH 7, 2009
The ink wasn’t even dry on the opinion and firms are out looking for “mass tort” clients.
wyeth-mass-torts

Recently on Twitter: