Comments on: Michael Jackson’s Doctor to be Charged with Manslaughter

By: david

david — Thu, 12 Nov 2009 11:35:34 +0000

a crime is a crime is a crime is a crime
giving people illegal meds is a crime and they should pay for this will jail time mainly when someone die from this like mj send this doctor to jail o

By: david

david — Thu, 12 Nov 2009 11:30:47 +0000

a crime is a crime so don’t go say’n just because
they are doctors that give people illeagl meds
its ok suppose i rob the corner store and not a bank that isn’t alright is it?????????????????????
so if they are giving people illegal meds they should be charged like anybody else!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

By: Unemployed WASP

Unemployed WASP — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:26:42 +0000

If you give someone 3 downers and then use one of the most regulated surgical anasthesias in existence to put them down and then saunter off to take a pee while they die then come back and get on the phone and call everyone up and chat for awhile before getting the dead person’s kid down there to watch you do CPR long after the guy deceased then I think there may be a problem with that no?

By: Lil' Freshski

Lil' Freshski — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:57:13 +0000

I fail to see this as “negligence” rather I see it as murder. He killed him to get fame.

By: Lil' Freshski

Lil' Freshski — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:53:18 +0000

Conrad is no doctor. He had no license. He was not a professional. He was a top loser. Lethal doses is what mattered in this case. He killed him and he should go right to fckin jail. he was also on the run. Why isnt he in jail now? He is like most illegals in this county who do not respect our laws. I dont know about any doctors giving anything like this. He looks like a snake. He was tying to get some fame. He’s the 1/100 psychopath out there! If someone did something illegal they should be arrested. Obviously Conrad has no respect for our laws, the media, MJ his family or anyone. This was no mistake. He wanted to take MJ’s fame and be in the media. A sick parasite if you ask me. I think he should be put to death and on death row like all the others! There are innocent people in jail on death row and somehow Conrad should get some break. No way. He could have called the police. They would have made it hot around the Jackson camp and maybe MJ would have got arrested but not mercy killed by some Dr Death Conrad.

By: Lil' Freshski

Lil' Freshski — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:37:30 +0000

This Conrad is a criminal. He reads well enough to graduate then he knew he was operating illegally. He looks like a snake. A psychopath who
was looking to hurt Micheal Jackson just as John Lennon or JFK was murdered for the spot light. I think America is a scarry place if you trust a foreigner like Conrad. He’s probably an illegal immagrant too. Anyway, MJ had his problems but if he’s going to be greedy and be a drug dealer Conrad had enough loot to hire a real doctor and make sure his house was fully equip’d with the proper scientific gadgets. I am really upset that MJ died. Yo I think capital punishment is the way to go as a deterent. He should at least be in jail now and not released and a life time ban on working in the medical field.

By: Phil

Phil — Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:42:47 +0000

What a sad conversation. I love Michael Jackson. That doctor should have realized Michael was addicted and gotten him into treatment. When Michael started demanding propofol, the doctor should have ordered an ambulance and sedated Michael enough to get him transported to rehab. Would he have been fired? Probably, but getting fired isn’t a good enough reason not to do the right thing. Michael’s kids are now orphans and this did not have to happen.

By: lonewolf69

lonewolf69 — Thu, 27 Aug 2009 05:26:46 +0000

stick to the subject dumdood or sory bumdood, i think you should try troubleshooting your name, its very annoying dungdood.

By: lonewolf69

lonewolf69 — Thu, 27 Aug 2009 00:57:28 +0000

weaning an addict off drugs is still supplying an addict drugs but in smaller doses and that addict wont come off it completely, cos most of the time they’ll jus come down to an amount that they’ll believe is sufficient enough to not be in the catergorie of a drug abuser.You could say that it almost defeats the purpose.Dr Drew did’nt wean his patients off any of the drugs they were taking,He simply removed them from their everyday enviroment and helped change their lifestyle and their surroundings thats how you treat drug addicts.Most druggies sent to jail for over a period of time have dried out or have become rehabilitated and clean because the access to any drug or a particular drug especially propofol would have been virtually impossible to obtain.Dr Murrays excuse about weaning his patient off propofol is obsurd and its over shadowing the main reason of the investigation and that is who kept MJ in supply of the drug.We already know who administered it weather it was an attempt to wean MJ off or not.Like any drug investigation you look for the supplier then you work your way down the chain right to the user who usually is the victim in this.YOU DON’T GIVE DRUG ADDICTS DRUGS OF ANY DOSE TO TRY AND REHABILITATE THEM.YOU CHANGE THE ENVIROMENT AND THEIR SURROUNDINGS WITH ZERO ACCESS TO ANY FORM OF DRUGS.

By: WhiteCoat

WhiteCoat — Wed, 26 Aug 2009 18:59:21 +0000

So William, I’m curious because I don’t really know the answer.
It’s obvious that a cause of death must take into account the circumstances surrounding a death, if known.
How often do coroners change the cause of death if new information comes to light?
For example, in this case, presumably the coroner already knew whether there was monitoring equipment in the house.
Suppose that later it comes to light that Dr. Murray knew that propofol shouldn’t have been used to help MJ sleep, but he also knew that MJ was addicted to too large of a dose of propofol to just stop the drug “cold turkey” and he was attempting to wean MJ down – much in the same way heroin addicts are weaned off of heroin using methadone.
Would the coroner be obliged to change the cause of death?