<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Link For My Loyal Attorney Readers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/2010/02/a-link-for-my-loyal-attorney-readers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/2010/02/a-link-for-my-loyal-attorney-readers/</link>
	<description>A blog from inside the emergency department</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 17:23:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fyrdoc</title>
		<link>http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/2010/02/a-link-for-my-loyal-attorney-readers/#comment-16717</link>
		<dc:creator>Fyrdoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 21:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/?p=4281#comment-16717</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Come on Max, go for the Phenom 100.  Cheaper, faster and single pilot capable.

http://www.embraerexecutivejets.com/english/content/aircraft/phenom100_home.asp

Gosh, it must be nice to only have 3 years of student loans and not have to go through that ugly 4 year residency while the interest just compounds and compounds...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on Max, go for the Phenom 100.  Cheaper, faster and single pilot capable.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.embraerexecutivejets.com/english/content/aircraft/phenom100_home.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.embraerexecutivejets.com/english/content/aircraft/phenom100_home.asp</a></p>
<p>Gosh, it must be nice to only have 3 years of student loans and not have to go through that ugly 4 year residency while the interest just compounds and compounds&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doc99</title>
		<link>http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/2010/02/a-link-for-my-loyal-attorney-readers/#comment-16708</link>
		<dc:creator>Doc99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 20:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/?p=4281#comment-16708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t get sued as often now that I refer patients to get a consult with a trial lawyer prior to any treatment plan.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get sued as often now that I refer patients to get a consult with a trial lawyer prior to any treatment plan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WhiteCoat</title>
		<link>http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/2010/02/a-link-for-my-loyal-attorney-readers/#comment-16701</link>
		<dc:creator>WhiteCoat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/?p=4281#comment-16701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have to admit that both Max and Matt&#039;s comments made me laugh. 
I might not agree with everything you write, but you&#039;re both definitely good sports.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to admit that both Max and Matt&#8217;s comments made me laugh.<br />
I might not agree with everything you write, but you&#8217;re both definitely good sports.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/2010/02/a-link-for-my-loyal-attorney-readers/#comment-16699</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 13:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/?p=4281#comment-16699</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Intriguing, thanks.

However, my Lexis subscription barely buys a days gas in the Maserati.  It won&#039;t even pay for the Windex the servants use in an hour on the yacht.

See if you can find a way to eliminate the client part and just have your insurers direct deposit the millions in my checking account.  Now THAT would be an innovation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Intriguing, thanks.</p>
<p>However, my Lexis subscription barely buys a days gas in the Maserati.  It won&#8217;t even pay for the Windex the servants use in an hour on the yacht.</p>
<p>See if you can find a way to eliminate the client part and just have your insurers direct deposit the millions in my checking account.  Now THAT would be an innovation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Kennerly</title>
		<link>http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/2010/02/a-link-for-my-loyal-attorney-readers/#comment-16694</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Kennerly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 01:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/?p=4281#comment-16694</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s good, but frustrating since you can&#039;t go deep into the citing references.

For example, let&#039;s search for the phrase &quot;kill all the lawyers.&quot;

http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&amp;q=%22kill+all+the+lawyers%22&amp;btnG=Search&amp;as_sdt=2002&amp;as_ylo=&amp;as_vis=0

Not bad! The first result, Walters v. National Assn. of Radiation Survivors, 473 US 305 (1985), indeed quotes Shakespeare. 

And if you want to see &quot;How Cited,&quot; it gives you a great set — better than Lexis or Westlaw — of how the case has actually been cited. Like so:

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?q=%22kill+all+the+lawyers%22&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2002&amp;about=8850853254235151488

But, you can&#039;t go deeper into each cite, which seriously limits the use as a tool for practicing lawyers.

I imagine that&#039;s on purpose; they want it useful for the general public to research major Supreme Court cases and general principles of law, but, for some business reason, don&#039;t want a full-fledged legal tool.

Alas, since I&#039;m keeping the Lexis subscription, I&#039;m going to have to settle for my Gulfstream V, instead of upgrading to the G550. 

Woe is me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s good, but frustrating since you can&#8217;t go deep into the citing references.</p>
<p>For example, let&#8217;s search for the phrase &#8220;kill all the lawyers.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&#038;q=%22kill+all+the+lawyers%22&#038;btnG=Search&#038;as_sdt=2002&#038;as_ylo=&#038;as_vis=0" rel="nofollow">http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&#038;q=%22kill+all+the+lawyers%22&#038;btnG=Search&#038;as_sdt=2002&#038;as_ylo=&#038;as_vis=0</a></p>
<p>Not bad! The first result, Walters v. National Assn. of Radiation Survivors, 473 US 305 (1985), indeed quotes Shakespeare. </p>
<p>And if you want to see &#8220;How Cited,&#8221; it gives you a great set — better than Lexis or Westlaw — of how the case has actually been cited. Like so:</p>
<p><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?q=%22kill+all+the+lawyers%22&#038;hl=en&#038;as_sdt=2002&#038;about=8850853254235151488" rel="nofollow">http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?q=%22kill+all+the+lawyers%22&#038;hl=en&#038;as_sdt=2002&#038;about=8850853254235151488</a></p>
<p>But, you can&#8217;t go deeper into each cite, which seriously limits the use as a tool for practicing lawyers.</p>
<p>I imagine that&#8217;s on purpose; they want it useful for the general public to research major Supreme Court cases and general principles of law, but, for some business reason, don&#8217;t want a full-fledged legal tool.</p>
<p>Alas, since I&#8217;m keeping the Lexis subscription, I&#8217;m going to have to settle for my Gulfstream V, instead of upgrading to the G550. </p>
<p>Woe is me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/2010/02/a-link-for-my-loyal-attorney-readers/#comment-16689</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 19:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/?p=4281#comment-16689</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google Scholar totally save my butt for a 6 page research paper I had to write over the summer. 2 hours GS-ing vs. 10 hours in a library pouring through books with no guarantee of success or recent material is a no brainer.

PS - I think you get a lot more out of GS if you go to a university which pays for database subscriptions, since GS automatically would say &quot;Full text provided by [My university library]&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Scholar totally save my butt for a 6 page research paper I had to write over the summer. 2 hours GS-ing vs. 10 hours in a library pouring through books with no guarantee of success or recent material is a no brainer.</p>
<p>PS &#8211; I think you get a lot more out of GS if you go to a university which pays for database subscriptions, since GS automatically would say &#8220;Full text provided by [My university library]&#8220;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
