<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Healthcare Update &#8212; 09-12-2011</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/2011/09/healthcare-update-09-12-2011/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/2011/09/healthcare-update-09-12-2011/</link>
	<description>A blog from inside the emergency department</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:31:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dilaudiddistributor</title>
		<link>http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/2011/09/healthcare-update-09-12-2011/#comment-60064</link>
		<dc:creator>Dilaudiddistributor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 16:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/?p=7132#comment-60064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow SeaSpray....think there could be just a bit of a conflict of interest if lawyers were paid by the size of the judgement they receive?  GEE!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow SeaSpray&#8230;.think there could be just a bit of a conflict of interest if lawyers were paid by the size of the judgement they receive?  GEE!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hueydoc</title>
		<link>http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/2011/09/healthcare-update-09-12-2011/#comment-59901</link>
		<dc:creator>Hueydoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 16:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/?p=7132#comment-59901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey WC- have you ever seen any doctor surveys about the different ER Companies ?
 I mean like comparisons,  pay, benefits, etc......]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey WC- have you ever seen any doctor surveys about the different ER Companies ?<br />
 I mean like comparisons,  pay, benefits, etc&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hueydoc</title>
		<link>http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/2011/09/healthcare-update-09-12-2011/#comment-59891</link>
		<dc:creator>Hueydoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 12:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/?p=7132#comment-59891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I worked a totally RVU system one Christmas day. Got to miss a holiday and got paid for seeing 7 patients. Oh, joy !]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I worked a totally RVU system one Christmas day. Got to miss a holiday and got paid for seeing 7 patients. Oh, joy !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/2011/09/healthcare-update-09-12-2011/#comment-59880</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 08:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/?p=7132#comment-59880</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And bullets don&#039;t instantly kill someone unless you&#039;re going for a headshot...which no cop is going to do.  So if you want to stop someone quickly a taser is still your best bet.  It might not be as 100% effective as a bullet, but when it does work it&#039;s fast acting.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And bullets don&#8217;t instantly kill someone unless you&#8217;re going for a headshot&#8230;which no cop is going to do.  So if you want to stop someone quickly a taser is still your best bet.  It might not be as 100% effective as a bullet, but when it does work it&#8217;s fast acting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ERMD</title>
		<link>http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/2011/09/healthcare-update-09-12-2011/#comment-59865</link>
		<dc:creator>ERMD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 06:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/?p=7132#comment-59865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paying emergency docs based on how many patients they see is a way to incentivize us to pick up charts at a reasonable pace. In a salaried system charts stack up since docs get paid to sit.  I have worked in essentially every method of reimbursement for EM docs and a totally RVU based system is the best. Docs don&#039;t blow through patients to make $$$, it is self limiting, you can only see so many patients before it is not safe. It is the rare doc who practices in this way.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paying emergency docs based on how many patients they see is a way to incentivize us to pick up charts at a reasonable pace. In a salaried system charts stack up since docs get paid to sit.  I have worked in essentially every method of reimbursement for EM docs and a totally RVU based system is the best. Docs don&#8217;t blow through patients to make $$$, it is self limiting, you can only see so many patients before it is not safe. It is the rare doc who practices in this way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SeaSpray</title>
		<link>http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/2011/09/healthcare-update-09-12-2011/#comment-59862</link>
		<dc:creator>SeaSpray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 05:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/?p=7132#comment-59862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow ...think there could be just a bit of a conflict of interest if ED docs are paid based on how many patients they see? GEE!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow &#8230;think there could be just a bit of a conflict of interest if ED docs are paid based on how many patients they see? GEE!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DocV</title>
		<link>http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/2011/09/healthcare-update-09-12-2011/#comment-59839</link>
		<dc:creator>DocV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 21:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/?p=7132#comment-59839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It has been shown that an attacker with a knife can cover 21 feet (6.4 m) in 1.5 seconds and Tasers don&#039;t always stop the threat.  Google &quot;Tueller Drill&quot; if you get a chance.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has been shown that an attacker with a knife can cover 21 feet (6.4 m) in 1.5 seconds and Tasers don&#8217;t always stop the threat.  Google &#8220;Tueller Drill&#8221; if you get a chance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/2011/09/healthcare-update-09-12-2011/#comment-59767</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 04:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/?p=7132#comment-59767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At least the cops killed the guy.  It&#039;s cheaper for a wrongful death suit than a paralysis or vegetable suit.  Should have used a taser though.  It&#039;s a bit excessive force to bring guns to a knife fight.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least the cops killed the guy.  It&#8217;s cheaper for a wrongful death suit than a paralysis or vegetable suit.  Should have used a taser though.  It&#8217;s a bit excessive force to bring guns to a knife fight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: burned-out medic</title>
		<link>http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/2011/09/healthcare-update-09-12-2011/#comment-59752</link>
		<dc:creator>burned-out medic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 01:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/?p=7132#comment-59752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i love people...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i love people&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
