Interesting issue brought to my attention by a reader in South Carolina.
One of the hospitals in South Carolina wanted to post a sign in its emergency department waiting room stating the following:
Prescribing Pain Medication in the Emergency Department
Our Emergency Department staff understands that pain relief is important when one is hurt or needs emergency care. However, providing pain relief is often a complex issue, especially when pain is a chronic or recurrent process. Mistakes or misuses of pain medication can cause serious health problems and even death. Our Emergency Department will only provide pain relief options that are safe and appropriate.
• The primary role of the Emergency Medicine provider is to look for and treat an emergency medical condition. We will use our best medical judgment when treating pain, following all legal and ethical guidelines.
• You may be asked about a history of pain medication use, misuse, or substance abuse before prescribing any pain medication.
• We may ask you to show a photo ID, such as a driver’s license, when you check into the Emergency Department or receive a prescription for pain medications. We may also research the statewide prescription data base regarding your prescription drug use.
• We may only provide enough pain medication to last until you can contact your doctor. We will prescribe pain medications with a lower risk of addiction and/or overdose when possible.
For your safety, we do not:
– Give pain medication shots for sudden increases in chronic pain, or aggravation of chronic pain syndromes.
– Refill lost or stolen prescriptions for medications. You must obtain refill prescriptions from your primary care provider or pain clinician.
– Prescribe missed methadone doses, or provide prescription refills for chronic pain management.
– Prescribe long-acting pain medications, such as OxyContin, MSContin, fentanyl patches, or methadone for chronic, non-cancer pain.
– Prescribe pain medications if you already receive pain medication from another doctor or emergency department.
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) had a different take.
EMTALA requires that every patient seeking care in the emergency department receive a “screening exam” and then receive “stabilizing treatment” of any emergency medical condition. In other words, if you are having a heart attack, the emergency department is required to stabilize you regardless of your ability to pay. If you have a runny nose or other non-emergency condition, the emergency department still has to examine you, but then doesn’t have to treat you. In either case, the hospital isn’t allowed to discourage you from seeking care.
CMS therefore wrote a letter to the South Carolina Hospital Association [.pdf flie] and advised it that hospitals displaying such a sign would likely “unduly coerce[ patients with legitimate medical needs] to leave the ED before receiving an appropriate medical screening exam.” Therefore, CMS considered such signs as potentially constituting an EMTALA violation.
I disagree with a lot of things about EMTALA. It is an unfunded mandate. Its reach has progressed far beyond the initial intent of the statute. But unless and until we repeal it, we are stuck with it.
I’m interested in your opinion, though.
Should a sign like the one above be considered an EMTALA violation?
Is it any different than hospitals that advertise their wait times? After all, a patient with an emergency medical condition may see the advertised wait time as being too long and might not go to a hospital because of it.
Vote below and leave a comment.